Quadro K2100M vs K1200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro K1200
2015
4 GB 128-bit, 45 Watt
7.56
+115%

K1200 outperforms K2100M by a whopping 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking497688
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.970.58
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGM107GK106
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date28 January 2015 (9 years ago)23 July 2013 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$321.97 $84.95
Current price$124 (0.4x MSRP)$208 (2.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K1200 has 757% better value for money than K2100M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512576
Core clock speed1058 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate35.9732.02
Floating-point performance1,151 gflops768.4 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro K1200 and Quadro K2100M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length160 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5000 MHz3000 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 80 GB/s48.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsmDP mDP mDP mDPNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Display Portno data1.2

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+
3D Vision Pro++
Mosaic++
nView Display Managementno data+
nView Desktop Management+no data
Optimusno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212
Shader Model55
OpenGL4.54.5
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
CUDA5.0+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K1200 7.56
+115%
K2100M 3.51

K1200 outperforms K2100M by 115% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K1200 2924
+115%
K2100M 1357

K1200 outperforms K2100M by 115% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

Quadro K1200 8739
+94.5%
K2100M 4492

K1200 outperforms K2100M by 95% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Quadro K1200 7848
+92.3%
K2100M 4082

K1200 outperforms K2100M by 92% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro K1200 9073
+200%
K2100M 3028

K1200 outperforms K2100M by 200% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

Quadro K1200 26
+136%
K2100M 11

K1200 outperforms K2100M by 136% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
+108%
24
−108%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.56 3.51
Recency 28 January 2015 23 July 2013
Cost $321.97 $84.95
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 55 Watt

The Quadro K1200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1200 is a workstation card while Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1200
Quadro K1200
NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Quadro K2100M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 85 votes

Rate Quadro K1200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 258 votes

Rate Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.