UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) vs Quadro GV100

#ad 
Buy Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100 Tesla PG500-216 Tesla V100 FHHL Tesla V100 PCIe Tesla V100 PCIe 16 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 SMX2 Tesla V100 SXM2 Tesla V100 SXM2 16 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM3 32 GB Tesla V100S PCIe 32 GB
VS
UHD Graphics 710 Mobile UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 750 (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 770 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GV100 with UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), including specs and performance data.

Quadro GV100
2018
32 GB HBM2, 250 Watt
47.04
+266%

GV100 outperforms UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) by a whopping 266% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking63385
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.07no data
Power efficiency13.9863.66
ArchitectureVolta (2017−2020)no data
GPU code nameGV100Rocket Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date27 March 2018 (7 years ago)30 March 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$8,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5120no data
Core clock speed1132 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1627 MHzno data
Number of transistors21,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate520.6no data
Floating-point processing power16.66 TFLOPSno data
ROPs128no data
TMUs320no data
Tensor Cores640no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2no data
Maximum RAM amount32 GBno data
Memory bus width4096 Bitno data
Memory clock speed848 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth868.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.131-
CUDA7.0-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD40−45
+233%
12
−233%

Cost per frame, $

1080p224.98no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 9
+0%
9
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6
+0%
6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Metro Exodus 7
+0%
7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Dota 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Far Cry 5 8
+0%
8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how Quadro GV100 and UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GV100 is 233% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 47.04 12.84
Recency 27 March 2018 30 March 2021
Chip lithography 12 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro GV100 has a 266.4% higher aggregate performance score, and a 16.7% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and 1566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GV100 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro GV100 is a workstation card while UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro GV100
Quadro GV100
Intel UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
RTX 8000 Quadro RTX 8000
UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
FirePro M2000 FirePro M2000
RX Vega 11 Radeon RX Vega 11
vs
R9 370X R9 370X
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
vs
520 Mobile GDDR5 Radeon 520 Mobile GDDR5
P104-101 P104 101
vs
RTX 2080 Ti RTX 2080 Ti
Quadro GV100 Quadro GV100
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
Radeon 530X Radeon 530X
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
RX 580 OEM Radeon RX 580 OEM
vs
Pro 580X Pro 580X
ATI VGA Wonder VGA Wonder
vs
Quadro T1000 Quadro T1000
GT 1030 DDR4 GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
vs
H800 SXM5 H800 SXM5

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 54 votes

Rate Quadro GV100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 115 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GV100 or UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake), agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.