Quadro T1000 Mobile vs GP100

Place in performance ranking	79	301
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.36	4.27
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	GP100	N19P-Q1
Market segment	Workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 October 2016 (7 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Current price	$1482	$1890

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro GP100 has 236% better value for money than T1000 Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	768
Core clock speed	1304 MHz	1395 MHz
Boost clock speed	1442 MHz	1455 MHz
Number of transistors	15,300 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	235 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	323.0	69.84
Floating-point performance	10,329 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro GP100 and Quadro T1000 Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1430 MHz	8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	732.2 GB/s	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.0	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro GP100 42.40
+150%

T1000 Mobile 16.94

GP100 outperforms T1000 Mobile by 150% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro GP100 16374
+150%

T1000 Mobile 6540

GP100 outperforms T1000 Mobile by 150% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	160−170 +150%	64 −150%
4K	120−130 +150%	48 −150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

65−70
+141%

27−30

−141%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	120−130 +150%	48 −150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +150%	27−30 −150%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +136%	55−60 −136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	130−140 +145%	53 −145%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +141%	27−30 −141%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +145%	49 −145%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +139%	45−50 −139%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +141%	75−80 −141%
Hitman 3	80−85 +142%	30−35 −142%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +139%	65−70 −139%
Metro Exodus	200−210 +141%	83 −141%
Red Dead Redemption 2	160−170 +139%	67 −139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +141%	50−55 −141%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +145%	50−55 −145%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	100−105 +133%	43 −133%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +150%	27−30 −150%
Battlefield 5	130−140 +136%	55−60 −136%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	110−120 +134%	47 −134%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +141%	27−30 −141%
Far Cry 5	100−105 +144%	41 −144%
Far Cry New Dawn	110−120 +139%	45−50 −139%
Forza Horizon 4	280−290 +146%	114 −146%
Hitman 3	80−85 +142%	30−35 −142%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +139%	65−70 −139%
Metro Exodus	130−140 +141%	54 −141%
Red Dead Redemption 2	140−150 +141%	58 −141%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +141%	50−55 −141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	150−160 +138%	63 −138%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +145%	50−55 −145%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	70−75 +141%	29 −141%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	70−75 +150%	27−30 −150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	80−85 +150%	32 −150%
Cyberpunk 2077	65−70 +141%	27−30 −141%
Far Cry 5	75−80 +142%	31 −142%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +141%	75−80 −141%
Horizon Zero Dawn	160−170 +139%	65−70 −139%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	130−140 +141%	50−55 −141%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	85−90 +143%	35 −143%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 +145%	50−55 −145%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

120−130

+140%

50
−140%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	80−85 +142%	30−35 −142%
Far Cry New Dawn	80−85 +150%	30−35 −150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	35−40 +133%	14−16 −133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	50−55 +138%	21−24 −138%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Far Cry 5	70−75 +150%	27−30 −150%
Forza Horizon 4	80−85 +142%	30−35 −142%
Hitman 3	50−55 +150%	20−22 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 +150%	30−35 −150%
Metro Exodus	75−80 +142%	30−35 −142%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	80−85 +142%	30−35 −142%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

70−75
+150%

27−30

−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−33 +131%	12−14 −131%
Hitman 3	30−33 +150%	12−14 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +145%	10−12 −145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	40−45 +135%	16−18 −135%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +140%	10−11 −140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 +125%	8−9 −125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +133%	3−4 −133%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +133%	9−10 −133%
Forza Horizon 4	55−60 +139%	21−24 −139%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +150%	18−20 −150%
Metro Exodus	40−45 +150%	16−18 −150%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 +129%	7−8 −129%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40
+133%

14−16

−133%

This is how Quadro GP100 and T1000 Mobile compete in popular games:

Quadro GP100 is 150% faster in 1080p
Quadro GP100 is 150% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	42.40	16.94
Recency	1 October 2016	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	16 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	235 Watt	50 Watt