Quadro P1000 vs Quadro GP100

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P102-100 P104-100 P106-090 P106-100 P400 P2000 P2200 P4000 P5000 Tesla P4 Tesla P40 Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
P1000 P2000 Mobile P2000 Max-Q P3000 Mobile P3200 P3200 Max-Q P4000 Mobile P4000 Max-Q P4200 P4200 Max-Q P5000 Mobile P5200

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro GP100 and Quadro P1000, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Quadro GP100
2016
16 GB HBM2, 235 Watt
31.01
+205%

GP100 outperforms P1000 by a whopping 205% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking177466
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.18
Power efficiency10.6520.53
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGP100GP107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 October 2016 (9 years ago)7 February 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$375

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584640
Core clock speed1304 MHz1493 MHz
Boost clock speed1442 MHz1519 MHz
Number of transistors15,300 million3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)235 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate323.048.61
Floating-point processing power10.34 TFLOPS1.555 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs22432
L1 Cache1.3 MB192 KB
L2 Cache4 MB1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm145 mm
Width2-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed715 MHz1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth732.2 GB/s96.13 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA6.06.1

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro GP100 31.01
+205%
Quadro P1000 10.17

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro GP100 13710
+205%
Samples: 38
Quadro P1000 4494
Samples: 3058

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Quadro GP100 88528
+510%
Quadro P1000 14517

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Quadro GP100 92763
+549%
Quadro P1000 14286

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD130−140
+202%
43
−202%
4K30−35
+173%
11
−173%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.72
4Kno data34.09

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 32
+0%
32
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+0%
30
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Dota 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 27
+0%
27
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16
+0%
16
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Metro Exodus 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Quadro GP100 and Quadro P1000 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro GP100 is 202% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro GP100 is 173% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 31.01 10.17
Recency 1 October 2016 7 February 2017
Maximum RAM amount 16 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 235 Watt 40 Watt

Quadro GP100 has a 204.9% higher aggregate performance score, and a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Quadro P1000, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months, a 14.3% more advanced lithography process, and 487.5% lower power consumption.

The Quadro GP100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P1000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
NVIDIA Quadro P1000
Quadro P1000
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
vs
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
Quadro P1000 Quadro P1000
vs
Pro WX Vega M GL Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
vs
Pro Vega II Duo Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
RX Vega XTX AMD RX Vega XTX
vs
ATI Rage 128 VR AGP 128 VR AGP
RX Vega XTX AMD RX Vega XTX
vs
Arc A350 A350
RTX 3090 Ti 3090 Ti
vs
RX Vega XT Vega XT
RX Vega XT AMD RX Vega XT
vs
Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU Z2 Extreme GPU
RX Vega XL AMD RX Vega XL
vs
Ryzen AI Z2 Extreme GPU Z2 Extreme GPU
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
vs
ATI X1650 GT X1650 GT
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
vs
GTX 1650 1650
Quadro GP100 Quadro GP100
vs
GTX 1650 GDDR6 1650 GDDR6
RTX 2060 Mobile 2060 Mobile
vs
RX Vega 56 Vega 56
RX Vega 56 AMD RX Vega 56
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile A1000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.4 15 votes

Rate Quadro GP100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 661 votes

Rate Quadro P1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro GP100 or Quadro P1000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.