GeForce 9300M GS vs Quadro GP100

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	79	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	14.38	no data
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code name	GP100	NB9M-GS
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 October 2016 (7 years ago)	4 June 2008 (16 years ago)
Current price	$1482	$19.95

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	3584	8
CUDA cores	no data	8
Core clock speed	1304 MHz	550 MHz
Boost clock speed	1442 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	15,300 million	210 million
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	235 Watt	13 Watt
Texture fill rate	323.0	4.400
Floating-point performance	10,329 gflops	22.4 gflops
Gigaflops	no data	34

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro GP100 and GeForce 9300M GS compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	MXM-I
Length	267 mm	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	HBM2	GDDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	256 MB
Memory bus width	4096 Bit	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	1430 MHz	700 MHz
Memory bandwidth	732.2 GB/s	11.2 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	6.4	4.0
OpenGL	4.6	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.2.131	N/A
CUDA	6.0	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

---

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	1 October 2016	4 June 2008
Maximum RAM amount	16 GB	256 MB
Chip lithography	16 nm	65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	235 Watt	13 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---