GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB vs Quadro FX Go1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX Go1400 with GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

FX Go1400
2005
256 MB DDR
0.24

RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB outperforms FX Go1400 by a whopping 22592% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking141051
Place by popularitynot in top-10028
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data75.79
Power efficiencyno data23.06
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameNV41GB206
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date25 February 2005 (20 years ago)16 April 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4608
Core clock speed275 MHz2407 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2572 MHz
Number of transistors222 million21,900 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data180 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200370.4
Floating-point processing powerno data23.7 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIIPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data241 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR7
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed295 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth18.88 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX Go1400 0.24
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB 54.46
+22592%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX Go1400 Samples: 14 101
RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB Samples: 2282 22818
+22492%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.24 54.46
Recency 25 February 2005 16 April 2025
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 5 nm

RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB has a 22591.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 20 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX Go1400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX Go1400 is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
Quadro FX Go1400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB
GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX Go1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1635 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX Go1400 or GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.