UHD Graphics 600 vs Quadro FX 880M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 880M with UHD Graphics 600, including specs and performance data.

FX 880M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, DDR3, 35 Watt
0.56

UHD Graphics 600 outperforms FX 880M by an impressive 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking11761093
Place by popularitynot in top-10033
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.60
ArchitectureGT2xx (2009−2012)Gen. 9 Gemini Lake (2017)
GPU code nameN10P-GLMGemini Lake
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Current price$980 $274

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 880M and UHD Graphics 600 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4812
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data700 MHz
Number of transistors486 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate8.8009.000
Floating-point performance116.16 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 880M and UHD Graphics 600 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x1

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3, DDR3DDR4 / LPDDR4
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 Bit64/128 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.16.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A+
CUDA1.2no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 880M 0.56
UHD Graphics 600 0.86
+53.6%

UHD Graphics 600 outperforms Quadro FX 880M by 54% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 880M 215
UHD Graphics 600 334
+55.3%

UHD Graphics 600 outperforms Quadro FX 880M by 55% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

FX 880M 2639
+20.5%
UHD Graphics 600 2189

Quadro FX 880M outperforms UHD Graphics 600 by 21% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD20
+81.8%
11
−81.8%
1440p0−11

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Hitman 3 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−57.1%
11
+57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4
−100%
6
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8−9
−62.5%
12−14
+62.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−100%
4
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−66.7%
10−11
+66.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Hitman 3 4−5
−75%
7−8
+75%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%

4K
High Preset

Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 1−2

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 1−2
Horizon Zero Dawn 0−1 1−2
Metro Exodus 2−3
−100%
4−5
+100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2

Full HD
High Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 1−2

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

This is how FX 880M and UHD Graphics 600 compete in popular games:

  • FX 880M is 82% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.56 0.86
Recency 7 January 2010 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 40 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 5 Watt

The UHD Graphics 600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 880M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 600 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Quadro FX 880M
Intel UHD Graphics 600
UHD Graphics 600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 39 votes

Rate Quadro FX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 3211 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.