ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650 vs Quadro FX 880M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 880M with Mobility Radeon HD 4650, including specs and performance data.

FX 880M
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 35 Watt
0.58

ATI Mobility HD 4650 outperforms FX 880M by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12111100
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.142.05
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGT216M96
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date7 January 2010 (15 years ago)9 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48320
Core clock speed550 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors486 million514 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate8.80016.00
Floating-point processing power0.1162 TFLOPS0.32 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1632

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount1 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz600 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/s19.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.14.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 880M 0.58
ATI Mobility HD 4650 1.04
+79.3%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 880M 223
ATI Mobility HD 4650 401
+79.8%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FX 880M 2639
+9.4%
ATI Mobility HD 4650 2413

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD19
+18.8%
16
−18.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Fortnite 0−1 4−5
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
World of Tanks 16−18
−41.2%
24−27
+41.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−28.6%
9−10
+28.6%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−33.3%
8−9
+33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−33.3%
12−14
+33.3%

1440p
High Preset

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−100%
6−7
+100%
World of Tanks 1−2
−400%
5−6
+400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−200%
3−4
+200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 5 0−1 0−1

4K
High Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

This is how FX 880M and ATI Mobility HD 4650 compete in popular games:

  • FX 880M is 19% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in World of Tanks, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the ATI Mobility HD 4650 is 400% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 4650 is ahead in 24 tests (73%)
  • there's a draw in 9 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.58 1.04
Recency 7 January 2010 9 January 2009
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 40 nm 55 nm

FX 880M has an age advantage of 11 months, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 37.5% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 4650, on the other hand, has a 79.3% higher aggregate performance score.

The Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 880M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 880M is a mobile workstation card while Mobility Radeon HD 4650 is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Quadro FX 880M
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4650
Mobility Radeon HD 4650

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 42 votes

Rate Quadro FX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 91 vote

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 4650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.