Radeon Instinct MI250X vs Quadro FX 770M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1171not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureG9x (2007−2010)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameNB9P-GLMAldebaran
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date14 August 2008 (15 years ago)8 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$527 no data
Current price$387 (0.7x MSRP)no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3214080
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors314 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate8.0001,496
Floating-point performance80 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on Quadro FX 770M and Radeon Instinct MI250X compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR2 / GDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount512 MB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz3.2 GB/s
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)N/A
Shader Model4.0N/A
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 500 Watt

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 770M and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon Instinct MI250X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 31 vote

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 121 vote

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.