Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB vs Quadro FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5800 with Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, including specs and performance data.

FX 5800
2008
4 GB GDDR3, 189 Watt
2.89

RX 9060 XT 16 GB outperforms FX 5800 by a whopping 1564% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking79574
Place by popularitynot in top-10070
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0281.76
Power efficiency1.1622.89
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 44
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)4 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,499 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RX 9060 XT 16 GB has 408700% better value for money than FX 5800.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2402048
Core clock speed610 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3130 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million29,700 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)189 Watt160 Watt
Texture fill rate48.80400.6
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS25.64 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width512 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s322.3 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1b, 2x DisplayPort 2.1a
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 5800 2.89
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 48.08
+1564%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 5800 1213
RX 9060 XT 16 GB 20146
+1561%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.89 48.08
Recency 11 November 2008 4 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 189 Watt 160 Watt

RX 9060 XT 16 GB has a 1563.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1275% more advanced lithography process, and 18.1% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 5800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Quadro FX 5800
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB
Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 27 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 369 votes

Rate Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5800 or Radeon RX 9060 XT 16 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.