Radeon R6 M340DX vs Quadro FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CX FX 3800 FX 4800 FX 4800 Mac Edition FX 5800 Plex 2200 D2 Plex 2200 S4 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla S1070 Tesla S1075 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
R5 M230 R5 M240 R5 M320 R5 M420 R5 M435 R6 M255DX R6 M335DX R6 M340DX R6 M435DX R7 M260DX R8 M350DX R8 M435DX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 5800 with Radeon R6 M340DX, including specs and performance data.

FX 5800
2008, $3,499
4 GB GDDR3, 189 Watt
2.89
+8.6%

FX 5800 outperforms R6 M340DX by a small 9% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 5800 FX 5800
R6 M340DX R6 M340DX

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking823857
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.18no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BJet
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)12 December 2015 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240384
Core clock speed610 MHz955 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1030 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million690 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)189 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.8024.72
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS0.791 TFLOPS
ROPs328
TMUs8024
L1 Cacheno data96 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16IGP
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width512 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.3-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD10−12
+0%
10
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p349.90no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6
+0%
6
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3
+0%
3
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how FX 5800 and R6 M340DX compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.89 2.66
Recency 11 November 2008 12 December 2015
Chip lithography 55 nm 28 nm

FX 5800 has a 8.6% higher aggregate performance score.

R6 M340DX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 96.4% more advanced lithography process.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro FX 5800 and Radeon R6 M340DX.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R6 M340DX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Quadro FX 5800
AMD Radeon R6 M340DX
Radeon R6 M340DX
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
vs
FirePro V5900 FirePro V5900
R6 M340DX Radeon R6 M340DX
vs
GeForce 840M GeForce 840M
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
vs
FireStream 9250 FireStream 9250
Quadro CX NVIDIA Quadro CX
vs
NVS 300 NVS 300
Quadro CX NVIDIA Quadro CX
vs
ATI 9600 XT Radeon 9600 XT
Quadro CX NVIDIA Quadro CX
vs
6200 SE TurboCache GeForce 6200 SE TurboCache
Quadro CX NVIDIA Quadro CX
vs
RTX A40 RTX A40
FX 4800 Mac Edition NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
vs
Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU Max 40-Core GPU
FX 5800 NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
vs
RTX 2060 Super RTX 2060 Super
FX 5800 NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
vs
GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB GTX 1050 Mobile 3 GB
FX 370 LP NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB Tesla V100 SXM2 32 GB
FX 370 LP NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP
vs
Jetson T4000 Jetson T4000
Plex 2100 S4 NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
vs
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.9 27 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 37 votes

Rate Radeon R6 M340DX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 5800 or Radeon R6 M340DX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.