NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs AMD FirePro M4150
Comparison of Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150 architecture, market type and release date.
Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Core clock speed
Manufacturing process technology
Power consumption (TDP)
Texture fill rate
48.8 GTexel / s
17.16 GTexel / s
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Information on Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Maximum RAM amount
Memory bus width
Memory clock speed
102.4 GB / s
64 GB / s
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150.
2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
APIs supported by Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150, sometimes including their particular versions.
Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
FX 5800 2.33
FirePro M4150 2.33
FX 5800 1110
FirePro M4150 1113 +0.3%
Rendering quality tests
GFXBench render quality
GFXBench high precision render quality
Let's see how good Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150 are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Wider memory bus (512 vs 128 bit)
Higher memory bandwidth (102.4 vs 64 GB/s)
Advantages of AMD FirePro M4150
Much newer (16 October 2013 vs 11 November 2008)
More pipelines (384 vs 240)
Finer manufacturing process technology (28 vs 55 nm)
So, Quadro FX 5800 or FirePro M4150?
Technical City couldn't decide between NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 and AMD FirePro M4150. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Quadro FX 5800 and FirePro M4150, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.