Radeon HD 6750M vs Quadro FX 4800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CX FX 3800 FX 4800 FX 4800 Mac Edition FX 5800 Plex 2200 S4 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla M1060 Tesla S1070 Tesla S1075 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6610M 6625M 6630M 6630M Mac Edition 6650M 6730M 6750M 6750M Mac Edition 6770M 7610M 7650M Rebrand 7670M Rebrand

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4800 with Radeon HD 6750M, including specs and performance data.

FX 4800
2008
1536 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.27
+7.1%

FX 4800 outperforms HD 6750M by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 4800 FX 4800
HD 6750M HD 6750M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking878901
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.234.90
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT200BWhistler
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2011 (14 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192480
Core clock speed602 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million716 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate38.5314.40
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS0.576 TFLOPS
ROPs248
TMUs6424
L1 Cacheno data48 KB
L2 Cache192 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-A (3.0)
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB1 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.3-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 4800 2.27
+7.1%
HD 6750M 2.12

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 4800 1004
+7.2%
Samples: 501
HD 6750M 937
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p21−24
+0%
21
+0%
Full HD24−27
+0%
24
+0%

Cost per frame, $

1080p74.96no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

This is how FX 4800 and HD 6750M compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 900p
  • A tie in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.27 2.12
Recency 11 November 2008 4 January 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 1 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 35 Watt

FX 4800 has a 7.1% higher aggregate performance score, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

HD 6750M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 328.6% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro FX 4800 and Radeon HD 6750M.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 6750M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800
Quadro FX 4800
AMD Radeon HD 6750M
Radeon HD 6750M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 4800 Quadro FX 4800
vs
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
HD 6750M Radeon HD 6750M
vs
HD Graphics 620 HD Graphics 620
FX 4800 Quadro FX 4800
vs
FX 5800 Quadro FX 5800
NVS 295 Quadro NVS 295
vs
GTX 460 SE v2 GTX 460 SE v2
NVS 295 Quadro NVS 295
vs
Radeon 610 Radeon 610
NVS 295 Quadro NVS 295
vs
Graphics Radeon Graphics
Tesla C1060 Tesla C1060
vs
Tesla M10 Tesla M10
FX 1800 Quadro FX 1800
vs
R5 340X OEM R5 340X OEM
Plex 1000 Model II Quadro Plex 1000 Model II
vs
H100 PCIe 96 GB PCIe 96 GB
Plex 2200 S4 Quadro Plex 2200 S4
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile RTX A1000 Mobile
Tesla M1060 Tesla M1060
vs
GeForce MX450 GeForce MX450
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile
VX 200 Quadro VX 200
vs
RTX 3070 Mobile RTX 3070 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 68 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 60 votes

Rate Radeon HD 6750M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4800 or Radeon HD 6750M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.