RTX A2000 12 GB vs Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated141
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data88.41
Power efficiencyno data35.38
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT200BGA106
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)23 November 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,799 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1923328
Core clock speed602 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate38.53124.8
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS7.987 TFLOPS
ROPs2448
TMUs64104
Tensor Coresno data104
Ray Tracing Coresno data26

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB12 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s288.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.38.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 70 Watt

RTX A2000 12 GB has an age advantage of 13 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 587.5% more advanced lithography process, and 114.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and RTX A2000 12 GB. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 136 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.