Stream Processor vs Quadro FX 4700 X2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking989not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.55no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameG92R580
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date18 April 2008 (17 years ago)2006 (19 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores128 ×2no data
Core clock speed600 MHz594 MHz
Number of transistors754 million384 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)226 Watt165 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40 ×29.504
Floating-point processing power0.384 TFLOPS ×2no data
ROPs16 ×216
TMUs64 ×216
L2 Cache64 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length267 mm241 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB ×21 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×2256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1296 MBps
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s ×241.47 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1 (full) 3.0 (partial)
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 226 Watt 165 Watt

FX 4700 X2 has a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

Stream Processor, on the other hand, has 37% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4700 X2 and Stream Processor. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4700 X2 is a workstation graphics card while Stream Processor is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4700 X2
Quadro FX 4700 X2
AMD Stream Processor
Stream Processor

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 4700 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 6 votes

Rate Stream Processor on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4700 X2 or Stream Processor, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.