GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 vs Tesla S1075

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGT200BGT218
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date1 June 2008 (17 years ago)17 April 2007 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240 ×416
Core clock speed610 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)800 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate48.80 ×44.160
Floating-point processing power0.6221 TFLOPS ×40.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs32 ×44
TMUs80 ×48
L2 Cache256 KB32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 GB ×4512 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit ×464 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s ×48 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.31.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 June 2008 17 April 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 800 Watt 40 Watt

Tesla S1075 has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 37.5% more advanced lithography process, and 1900% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Tesla S1075 and GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Tesla S1075 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Tesla S1075
Tesla S1075
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2
GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2 votes

Rate Tesla S1075 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Tesla S1075 or GeForce 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.