UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro FX 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

FX 4600
2007
768 MB GDDR3, 134 Watt
1.11

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Quadro FX 4600 by a whopping 453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking1045549
Place by popularitynot in top-10022
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.041.28
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Alder Lake
GPU code nameG80Alder Lake xG
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date5 March 2007 (17 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data
Current price$179 (0.1x MSRP)$878

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

UHD Graphics 770 has 3100% better value for money than FX 4600.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores9632
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data300 MHz
Number of transistors681 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0026.40
Floating-point performance230.4 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotIGP
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount768 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width384 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1550 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4600 1.11
UHD Graphics 770 6.14
+453%

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Quadro FX 4600 by 453% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 4600 430
UHD Graphics 770 2761
+542%

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Quadro FX 4600 by 542% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−500%
18
+500%
4K2−3
−600%
14
+600%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.11 6.14
Recency 5 March 2007 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 15 Watt

The UHD Graphics 770 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4600 is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1044 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.