RTX A400 vs Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.93
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNV17 A3GA107
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date16 July 2004 (21 years ago)16 April 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data768
Core clock speed220 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1762 MHz
Number of transistors29 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.88 ×242.29
Floating-point processing powerno data2.706 TFLOPS
ROPs2 ×216
TMUs4 ×224
Tensor Coresno data24
Ray Tracing Coresno data6

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data163 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount64 MB ×24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit ×264 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth5.312 GB/s ×296 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x LFH604x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 July 2004 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 18 Watt 50 Watt

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI has 177.8% lower power consumption.

RTX A400, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 19 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1775% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro4 400 NVS PCI and RTX A400. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
NVIDIA RTX A400
RTX A400

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 46 votes

Rate RTX A400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro4 400 NVS PCI or RTX A400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.