Radeon RX 6600M vs Quadro FX 4600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 4600 with Radeon RX 6600M, including specs and performance data.

FX 4600
2007, $1,999
768 MB GDDR3, 134 Watt
0.96

6600M outperforms FX 4600 by a whopping 3364% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1167175
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.5525.60
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG80Navi 23
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 March 2007 (18 years ago)31 May 2021 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961792
Core clock speed500 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2416 MHz
Number of transistors681 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate24.00270.6
Floating-point processing power0.2304 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs24112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache96 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount768 MB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 4600 0.96
RX 6600M 33.25
+3364%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 4600 402
Samples: 382
RX 6600M 13904
+3359%
Samples: 895

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−4900%
100
+4900%
1440p1−2
−5300%
54
+5300%
4K0−130

Cost per frame, $

1080p999.50no data
1440p1999.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 107
+0%
107
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 115
+0%
115
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 83
+0%
83
+0%
Far Cry 5 116
+0%
116
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 202
+0%
202
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 108
+0%
108
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 199
+0%
199
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 116
+0%
116
+0%
Metro Exodus 80
+0%
80
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 142
+0%
142
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Dota 2 104
+0%
104
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 168
+0%
168
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85
+0%
85
+0%
Valorant 144
+0%
144
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 61
+0%
61
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 39
+0%
39
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 128
+0%
128
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+0%
62
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Metro Exodus 28
+0%
28
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 44
+0%
44
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+0%
19
+0%
Dota 2 80
+0%
80
+0%
Far Cry 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+0%
74
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

This is how FX 4600 and RX 6600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6600M is 4900% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6600M is 5300% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 60 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.96 33.25
Recency 5 March 2007 31 May 2021
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 100 Watt

RX 6600M has a 3363.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 966.7% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 34% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 6600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 4600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6600M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
AMD Radeon RX 6600M
Radeon RX 6600M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 13 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 1114 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 4600 or Radeon RX 6600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.