Radeon R7 350 OEM vs Quadro FX 4600
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1159 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.55 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) |
| GPU code name | G80 | Oland |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 5 March 2007 (18 years ago) | 5 May 2015 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $1,999 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1050 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 681 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 134 Watt | 65 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 24.00 | 25.20 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.2304 TFLOPS | 0.8064 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 24 | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 96 KB | 256 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 229 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 384 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 700 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 67.2 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| HDMI | - | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 5 March 2007 | 5 May 2015 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 768 MB | 1 GB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 134 Watt | 65 Watt |
R7 350 OEM has an age advantage of 8 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221.4% more advanced lithography process, and 106.2% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 4600 and Radeon R7 350 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro FX 4600 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon R7 350 OEM is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
