Matrox Parhelia 256 MB vs Quadro NVS 285

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1508not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Parhelia (2002−2006)
GPU code nameNV44 A2Parhelia-512
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date6 June 2006 (19 years ago)25 June 2002 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$27.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed275 MHz200 MHz
Number of transistors75 million80 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)18 Wattno data
Texture fill rate1.1000.8
ROPs24
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 4x
Length168 mm175 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed250 MHz250 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s16 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-592x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)8.1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.11.5
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 June 2006 25 June 2002
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 110 nm 150 nm

NVS 285 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 36.4% more advanced lithography process.

Matrox Parhelia 256 MB, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 285 and Matrox Parhelia 256 MB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 285 is a workstation graphics card while Matrox Parhelia 256 MB is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 285
Quadro NVS 285
Matrox Parhelia 256 MB
Parhelia 256 MB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 6 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 11 votes

Rate Matrox Parhelia 256 MB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro NVS 285 or Matrox Parhelia 256 MB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.