Quadro FX 4500 vs FX 4600

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

FX 4600
2007
768 MB GDDR3
1.11
+88.1%

FX 4600 outperforms FX 4500 by 88% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking10411165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.04no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameG80G70
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2007 (17 years ago)28 July 2005 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 $2,499
Current price$179 (0.1x MSRP)$115 (0x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FX 4600 and FX 4500 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96no data
Core clock speed500 MHz430 MHz
Number of transistors681 million302 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)134 Watt109 Watt
Texture fill rate24.0010.32
Floating-point performance230.4 gflopsno data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length229 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount768 MB512 MB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1400 MHz1050 MHz
Memory bandwidth67.2 GB/s33.6 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 4600 1.11
+88.1%
FX 4500 0.59

FX 4600 outperforms FX 4500 by 88% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FX 4600 430
+89.4%
FX 4500 227

FX 4600 outperforms FX 4500 by 89% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 1.11 0.59
Recency 5 March 2007 28 July 2005
Cost $1999 $2499
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 110 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 134 Watt 109 Watt

The Quadro FX 4600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 4500 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600
Quadro FX 4600
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4500
Quadro FX 4500

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 12 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 4500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.