Radeon RX 6750 XT vs Quadro FX 3800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CX FX 3800 FX 4800 FX 4800 Mac Edition FX 5800 Plex 2200 S4 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla M1060 Tesla S1070 Tesla S1075 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
6700 6700 XT 6750 GRE 6750 GRE 10 GB 6750 GRE 12 GB 6750 XT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3800 with Radeon RX 6750 XT, including specs and performance data.

FX 3800
2009, $799
1 GB GDDR3, 108 Watt
1.97

6750 XT outperforms FX 3800 by a whopping 2408% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
FX 3800 FX 3800
RX 6750 XT RX 6750 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking93171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0450.07
Power efficiency1.4015.17
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 22
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date30 March 2009 (16 years ago)3 March 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 $549

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 6750 XT has 125075% better value for money than FX 3800.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922560
Core clock speed600 MHz2150 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate38.40416.0
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS13.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs64160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache128 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3800 1.97
RX 6750 XT 49.41
+2408%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3800 823
Samples: 808
RX 6750 XT 20677
+2412%
Samples: 4769

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−2617%
163
+2617%
1440p3−4
−2833%
88
+2833%
4K1−2
−4900%
50
+4900%

Cost per frame, $

1080p133.17
−3854%
3.37
+3854%
1440p266.33
−4169%
6.24
+4169%
4K799.00
−7177%
10.98
+7177%
  • RX 6750 XT has 3854% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT has 4169% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT has 7177% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 353
+0%
353
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 165
+0%
165
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 346
+0%
346
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 127
+0%
127
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 178
+0%
178
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 217
+0%
217
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220
+0%
220
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 109
+0%
109
+0%
Dota 2 154
+0%
154
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 170
+0%
170
+0%
Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 186
+0%
186
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 127
+0%
127
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 245
+0%
245
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 98
+0%
98
+0%
Dota 2 131
+0%
131
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 158
+0%
158
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135
+0%
135
+0%
Valorant 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126
+0%
126
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+0%
350−400
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+0%
106
+0%
Metro Exodus 76
+0%
76
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60
+0%
60
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 33
+0%
33
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 79
+0%
79
+0%
Valorant 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Dota 2 101
+0%
101
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 78
+0%
78
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

This is how FX 3800 and RX 6750 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6750 XT is 2617% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6750 XT is 2833% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6750 XT is 4900% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.97 49.41
Recency 30 March 2009 3 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 250 Watt

FX 3800 has 131.5% lower power consumption.

RX 6750 XT, on the other hand, has a 2408.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6750 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3800 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3800 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 6750 XT is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
Quadro FX 3800
AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT
Radeon RX 6750 XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
RX 6750 XT Radeon RX 6750 XT
vs
RTX 5060 GeForce RTX 5060
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
Pro V320 Pro V320
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
GTX 480 512 GTX 480 Core 512
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
GT 430 PCI GT 430 PCI
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
RTX 2060 TU104 RTX 2060 TU104
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
H100 PCIe H100 PCIe
FX 3800 Quadro FX 3800
vs
Radeon 780M Radeon 780M
Quadro CX Quadro CX
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650 Media Accelerator (GMA) 3650
Quadro CX Quadro CX
vs
S7150 x2 FirePro S7150 x2
Quadro CX Quadro CX
vs
RTX A2000 Mobile RTX A2000 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.1 51 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 3145 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6750 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3800 or Radeon RX 6750 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.