GeForce 310 OEM vs Quadro FX 370M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1360not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.84no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG98GT218
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date15 August 2008 (16 years ago)27 November 2009 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores816
Core clock speed550 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors210 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt31 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2004.712
Floating-point processing power0.0224 TFLOPS0.04486 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz333 MHz
Memory bandwidth9.6 GB/s5.328 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCL1.11.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.11.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 August 2008 27 November 2009
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 31 Watt

FX 370M has 55% lower power consumption.

310 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370M and GeForce 310 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 370M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce 310 OEM is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M
Quadro FX 370M
NVIDIA GeForce 310 OEM
GeForce 310 OEM

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 22 votes

Rate GeForce 310 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.