GeForce4 488 Go vs Quadro FX 3700M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1061not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.10no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameG92NV18 A4
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date14 August 2008 (16 years ago)1 March 2002 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$925 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1282
Core clock speed550 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data275 MHz
Number of transistors754 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Wattno data
Texture fill rate35.201.200
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPSno data
ROPs162
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEAGP 8x

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR
Maximum RAM amount1 GB64 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz275 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s8.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)8.0
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.31.3
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 1 March 2002
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 65 nm 150 nm

FX 3700M has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 3700M and GeForce4 488 Go. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce4 488 Go is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX 3700M
NVIDIA GeForce4 488 Go
GeForce4 488 Go

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GeForce4 488 Go on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.