GeForce RTX 5090 vs Quadro FX 3700M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3700M with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

FX 3700M
2008
1 GB GDDR3, 75 Watt
1.01

RTX 5090 outperforms FX 3700M by a whopping 8537% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10872
Place by popularitynot in top-10013
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0210.94
Power efficiency1.0712.04
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameG92GB202
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (16 years ago)30 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$925 $1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 5090 has 54600% better value for money than FX 3700M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12821760
Core clock speed550 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors754 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate35.201,637
Floating-point processing power0.352 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs16176
TMUs64680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-HEPCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA+10.1
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3700M 1.01
RTX 5090 87.23
+8537%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3700M 452
RTX 5090 38990
+8526%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−11800%
238
+11800%
1440p2−3
−9950%
201
+9950%
4K1−2
−15600%
157
+15600%

Cost per frame, $

1080p462.50
−5407%
8.40
+5407%
1440p462.50
−4550%
9.95
+4550%
4K925.00
−7165%
12.73
+7165%
  • RTX 5090 has 5407% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 has 4550% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 has 7165% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8267%
250−260
+8267%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8000%
240−250
+8000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8267%
250−260
+8267%
Battlefield 5 0−1 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8000%
240−250
+8000%
Fortnite 2−3
−15000%
300−350
+15000%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−5633%
300−350
+5633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1867%
170−180
+1867%
Valorant 30−35
−2025%
650−700
+2025%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 3−4
−8267%
250−260
+8267%
Battlefield 5 0−1 190−200
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 24−27
−969%
270−280
+969%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8000%
240−250
+8000%
Dota 2 14−16
−8233%
1250−1300
+8233%
Fortnite 2−3
−15000%
300−350
+15000%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−5633%
300−350
+5633%
Metro Exodus 1−2
−6800%
69
+6800%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1867%
170−180
+1867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−8580%
400−450
+8580%
Valorant 30−35
−2025%
650−700
+2025%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−8000%
240−250
+8000%
Dota 2 14−16
−8233%
1250−1300
+8233%
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
−5633%
300−350
+5633%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
−1867%
170−180
+1867%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−7060%
358
+7060%
Valorant 30−35
−2025%
650−700
+2025%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−15000%
300−350
+15000%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 6−7
−8500%
500−550
+8500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
−1491%
170−180
+1491%
Valorant 2−3
−24150%
450−500
+24150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−15800%
150−160
+15800%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−20700%
200−210
+20700%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−10100%
300−350
+10100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−16250%
327
+16250%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−7450%
150−160
+7450%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 0−1 128
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−1147%
180−190
+1147%
Valorant 6−7
−5433%
300−350
+5433%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 75−80
Dota 2 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
−16900%
170−180
+16900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−4700%
95−100
+4700%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 2−3
−3850%
75−80
+3850%

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Far Cry 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Far Cry 5 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Metro Exodus 202
+0%
202
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Metro Exodus 167
+0%
167
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 386
+0%
386
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

This is how FX 3700M and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 11800% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 9950% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 15600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5090 is 24150% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is ahead in 36 tests (65%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (35%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.01 87.23
Recency 14 August 2008 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 575 Watt

FX 3700M has 666.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 8536.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3700M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 3700M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M
Quadro FX 3700M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
GeForce RTX 5090

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3700M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 2303 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3700M or GeForce RTX 5090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.