Tesla K80m vs Quadro FX 370

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1380not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.43no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameG84GK210
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 September 2007 (17 years ago)17 November 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162x 2496
Core clock speed360 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data824 MHz
Number of transistors289 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate2.8802x 182.2 billion/sec
Floating-point processing power0.02304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs42x 48
TMUs82x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length198 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2x 12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit2x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s2x 240.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVINo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 300 Watt

FX 370 has 757.1% lower power consumption.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 370 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 370
Quadro FX 370
NVIDIA Tesla K80m
Tesla K80m

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.2 10 votes

Rate Quadro FX 370 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.