Radeon 760M vs Quadro FX 3600M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX 3600M with Radeon 760M, including specs and performance data.
760M outperforms FX 3600M by a whopping 1086% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1105 | 405 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.21 | 66.95 |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025) |
| GPU code name | G92 | Phoenix |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 23 February 2008 (17 years ago) | 31 January 2024 (1 year ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 64 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2599 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 754 million | 25,390 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 16.00 | 83.17 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.16 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 8 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-HE | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Width | no data | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 799 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 51.14 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Motherboard Dependent |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.8 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 2−3
−1400%
| 30
+1400%
|
| 1440p | 1−2
−1700%
| 18
+1700%
|
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1400%
|
30
+1400%
|
| God of War | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−5700%
|
55−60
+5700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1100%
|
24
+1100%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−1800%
|
38
+1800%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−700%
|
55−60
+700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| God of War | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−444%
|
45−50
+444%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−256%
|
110−120
+256%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−5700%
|
55−60
+5700%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 27−30
−585%
|
180−190
+585%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−800%
|
18
+800%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−444%
|
85−90
+444%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−1650%
|
35
+1650%
|
| Fortnite | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−700%
|
55−60
+700%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| God of War | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 0−1 | 35 |
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
−1300%
|
27−30
+1300%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−444%
|
45−50
+444%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−414%
|
36
+414%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−256%
|
110−120
+256%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 1−2
−5700%
|
55−60
+5700%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
−1300%
|
27−30
+1300%
|
| Dota 2 | 16−18
−444%
|
85−90
+444%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 2−3
−1550%
|
33
+1550%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 7−8
−700%
|
55−60
+700%
|
| God of War | 5−6
−440%
|
27−30
+440%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−444%
|
45−50
+444%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 7−8
−229%
|
23
+229%
|
| Valorant | 30−35
−256%
|
110−120
+256%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−3750%
|
75−80
+3750%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−433%
|
16
+433%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 7−8
−1329%
|
100−105
+1329%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 12−14
−892%
|
110−120
+892%
|
| Valorant | 2−3
−6900%
|
140−150
+6900%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| Far Cry 5 | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 3−4
−967%
|
30−35
+967%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 0−1 | 18−20 |
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−1350%
|
27−30
+1350%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−66.7%
|
24−27
+66.7%
|
| Valorant | 6−7
−1117%
|
70−75
+1117%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Dota 2 | 0−1 | 45−50 |
| God of War | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−550%
|
12−14
+550%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 2−3
−550%
|
12−14
+550%
|
Full HD
Low Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 105
+0%
|
105
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 77
+0%
|
77
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 33
+0%
|
33
+0%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| God of War | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
High Preset
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
This is how FX 3600M and Radeon 760M compete in popular games:
- Radeon 760M is 1400% faster in 1080p
- Radeon 760M is 1700% faster in 1440p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the Radeon 760M is 6900% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 760M performs better in 42 tests (74%)
- there's a draw in 15 tests (26%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 1.11 | 13.17 |
| Recency | 23 February 2008 | 31 January 2024 |
| Chip lithography | 65 nm | 4 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 70 Watt | 15 Watt |
Radeon 760M has a 1086.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 1525% more advanced lithography process, and 366.7% lower power consumption.
The Radeon 760M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3600M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro FX 3600M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon 760M is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
