GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1508not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.52no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG72G92
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 March 2006 (19 years ago)21 July 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$160

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7128
Core clock speed450 MHz725 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt125 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80046.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs216
TMUs464
L2 Cacheno data64 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data229 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2006 21 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 125 Watt

FX 350M has 733.3% lower power consumption.

9800 GT Rebrand, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 38.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation graphics card while GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX 350M
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 28 votes

Rate GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350M or GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.