GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 vs ATI Mobility Radeon X2300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameM64NV34 B1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date1 March 2007 (18 years ago)6 March 2003 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6no data
Core clock speed479 MHz250 MHz
Boost clock speed480 MHzno data
Number of transistors107 million45 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm150 nm
Texture fill rate1.9161.000
ROPs44
TMUs44

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16AGP 8x
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount64 MB128 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed392 MHz200 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.272 GB/s3.2 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)9.0a
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.01.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2007 6 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 150 nm

ATI Mobility X2300 has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 87.5% more advanced lithography process.

FX 5200 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between Mobility Radeon X2300 and GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Mobility Radeon X2300 is a notebook graphics card while GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI Mobility Radeon X2300
Mobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIA GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2
GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 57 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon X2300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Mobility Radeon X2300 or GeForce FX 5200 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.