Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition vs Quadro FX 350M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1508not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.52no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG72Tahiti
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date13 March 2006 (19 years ago)7 March 2013 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores71792
Core clock speed450 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors112 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate1.80089.60
Floating-point processing powerno data2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs4112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data279 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed450 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_1)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2006 7 March 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 3 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 200 Watt

FX 350M has 1233.3% lower power consumption.

HD 7950 Mac Edition, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350M and Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350M is a mobile workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350M
Quadro FX 350M
AMD Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition
Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 22 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 350M or Radeon HD 7950 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.