Radeon RX 7990 XTX vs Quadro FX 350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1370not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.73no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG72Navi 31
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed550 MHz2500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data3599 MHz
Number of transistors112 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt405 Watt
Texture fill rate2.2001,382
Floating-point processing powerno data88.45 TFLOPS
ROPs2192
TMUs4384
Ray Tracing Coresno data96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm287 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone3x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB24 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz3000 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s1.15 TB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 405 Watt

FX 350 has 1828.6% lower power consumption.

RX 7990 XTX, on the other hand, has a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and Radeon RX 7990 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7990 XTX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350
AMD Radeon RX 7990 XTX
Radeon RX 7990 XTX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 387 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7990 XTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.