Radeon RX 5500M vs Quadro FX 350

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated360
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data11.73
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG72Navi 14
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date20 April 2006 (18 years ago)7 October 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1408
Core clock speed550 MHz1375 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1645 MHz
Number of transistors112 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)21 Watt85 Watt
Texture fill rate2.200144.8
Floating-point processing powerno data4.632 TFLOPS
ROPs232
TMUs488

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed405 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.48 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGANo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_1)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 350 85
RX 5500M 5563
+6445%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 April 2006 7 October 2019
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 21 Watt 85 Watt

FX 350 has 304.8% lower power consumption.

RX 5500M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 350 and Radeon RX 5500M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 350 is a workstation card while Radeon RX 5500M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 350
Quadro FX 350
AMD Radeon RX 5500M
Radeon RX 5500M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Quadro FX 350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 351 vote

Rate Radeon RX 5500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.