FirePro S9050 vs Quadro FX 3000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 3000 and FirePro S9050, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

FX 3000
2003, $203
256 MB DDR
0.16

S9050 outperforms FX 3000 by a whopping 7225% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1479450
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data4.01
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameNV35Tahiti
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 July 2003 (22 years ago)7 August 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$203 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Number of transistors135 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data225 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200100.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.226 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs8112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data254 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors1x Molex1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed425 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth27.2 GB/s264 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.5 (2.1)4.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

FX 3000 0.16
FirePro S9050 11.72
+7225%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 3000 69
Samples: 14
FirePro S9050 4901
+7003%
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.16 11.72
Recency 22 July 2003 7 August 2014
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 28 nm

FirePro S9050 has a 7225% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

The FirePro S9050 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 3000 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 3000
Quadro FX 3000
AMD FirePro S9050
FirePro S9050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 6 votes

Rate FirePro S9050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro FX 3000 or FirePro S9050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.