UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs Quadro FX 2500M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Quadro FX 2500M with UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), including specs and performance data.
Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) outperforms 2500M by a whopping 1196% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1278 | 598 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 0.89 | no data |
| Architecture | Curie (2003−2013) | Gen. 12 (2021−2023) |
| GPU code name | G71 | Alder Lake Xe |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 29 September 2005 (20 years ago) | 4 January 2022 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $99.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 32 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 500 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 500 MHz | 1400 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 278 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | no data |
| Texture fill rate | 12.00 | no data |
| ROPs | 16 | no data |
| TMUs | 24 | no data |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-III | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 512 MB | no data |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | no data |
| Memory clock speed | 600 MHz | no data |
| Memory bandwidth | 38.4 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | no data |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| Quick Sync | no data | + |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12_1 |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | no data |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | no data |
| OpenCL | N/A | no data |
| Vulkan | N/A | - |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:
| Full HD | 1−2
−2000%
| 21
+2000%
|
| 1440p | 0−1 | 11 |
Cost per frame, $
| 1080p | 99.99 | no data |
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1700%
|
18
+1700%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1400%
|
15
+1400%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−675%
|
30−35
+675%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−174%
|
70−75
+174%
|
Full HD
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18
−553%
|
110−120
+553%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1000%
|
11
+1000%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−382%
|
53
+382%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−675%
|
30−35
+675%
|
| Metro Exodus | 0−1 | 11 |
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−283%
|
23
+283%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
−174%
|
70−75
+174%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2
−1300%
|
14−16
+1300%
|
| Dota 2 | 10−12
−345%
|
49
+345%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 4−5
−675%
|
30−35
+675%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 8−9
−213%
|
24−27
+213%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7
−83.3%
|
11
+83.3%
|
| Valorant | 27−30
+22.7%
|
22
−22.7%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 3−4
−333%
|
12−14
+333%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 2−3
−2550%
|
50−55
+2550%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 6−7
−567%
|
40−45
+567%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Escape from Tarkov | 2−3
−550%
|
12−14
+550%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3
−700%
|
16−18
+700%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 2−3
−350%
|
9−10
+350%
|
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 0−1 | 14−16 |
4K
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−28.6%
|
18−20
+28.6%
|
| Valorant | 3−4
−1067%
|
35−40
+1067%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 2−3
−250%
|
7−8
+250%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 25
+0%
|
25
+0%
|
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 30−35
+0%
|
30−35
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 19
+0%
|
19
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 5 | 22
+0%
|
22
+0%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12
+0%
|
12
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 27−30
+0%
|
27−30
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18
+0%
|
18
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 40−45
+0%
|
40−45
+0%
|
1440p
High
| Grand Theft Auto V | 6
+0%
|
6
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 7−8
+0%
|
7−8
+0%
|
| Valorant | 75−80
+0%
|
75−80
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 12−14
+0%
|
12−14
+0%
|
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 14
+0%
|
14
+0%
|
4K
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Metro Exodus | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Counter-Strike 2 | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 2−3
+0%
|
2−3
+0%
|
| Dota 2 | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Escape from Tarkov | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7
+0%
|
6−7
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 10−12
+0%
|
10−12
+0%
|
This is how FX 2500M and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 2000% faster in 1080p
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Valorant, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the FX 2500M is 23% faster.
- in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is 2550% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- FX 2500M performs better in 1 test (2%)
- UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) performs better in 27 tests (45%)
- there's a draw in 32 tests (53%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.52 | 6.74 |
| Recency | 29 September 2005 | 4 January 2022 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 10 nm |
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) has a 1196.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, and a 800% more advanced lithography process.
The UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 2500M in performance tests.
Be aware that Quadro FX 2500M is a mobile workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is a mobile workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
