Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU vs GeForce Go 7900 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1239not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.11no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)no data
GPU code nameG71no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date18 April 2006 (19 years ago)31 October 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3240
Core clock speed500 MHzno data
Boost clock speed500 MHzno data
Number of transistors278 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt53 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00no data
ROPs16no data
TMUs24no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargemedium sized
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)no data
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 April 2006 31 October 2023
Chip lithography 90 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 53 Watt

Go 7900 GTX has 17.8% lower power consumption.

Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 1700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce Go 7900 GTX and M3 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce Go 7900 GTX
GeForce Go 7900 GTX
Apple M3 Max 40-Core GPU
M3 Max 40-Core GPU

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 2 votes

Rate GeForce Go 7900 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 274 votes

Rate M3 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce Go 7900 GTX or M3 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.