UHD Graphics 605 vs Quadro FX 1700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1067
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data16.31
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameG84Gemini Lake GT1.5
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 September 2007 (17 years ago)11 December 2017 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$699 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32144
Core clock speed460 MHz200 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors289 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)42 Watt5 Watt
Texture fill rate7.36013.50
Floating-point processing power0.05888 TFLOPS0.216 TFLOPS
ROPs83
TMUs1618

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16Ring Bus
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width256 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed400 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.



Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 1700 181
UHD Graphics 605 453
+150%

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 September 2007 11 December 2017
Chip lithography 80 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 42 Watt 5 Watt

UHD Graphics 605 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 471.4% more advanced lithography process, and 740% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1700 and UHD Graphics 605. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1700 is a workstation card while UHD Graphics 605 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700
Quadro FX 1700
Intel UHD Graphics 605
UHD Graphics 605

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 24 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 804 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 605 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.