GeForce 405M vs Quadro FX 1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)GT2xx (2009−2012)
GPU code nameNV41GT218
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)11 May 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$799 no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed350 MHz606 MHz
Number of transistors222 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate4.2004.848
Floating-point performanceno data0.03878 gflops
Gigaflopsno data73

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR3, DDR3
Maximum RAM amount128 MBUp to 512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoDisplayPort, HDMI, VGA, Dual Link DVI, Single Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 API
Shader Model3.04.1
OpenGL2.14.5
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 11 May 2012
Chip lithography 130 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 14 Watt

GeForce 405M has an age advantage of 7 years, a 225% more advanced lithography process, and 292.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1400 and GeForce 405M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 1400 is a workstation card while GeForce 405M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1400
Quadro FX 1400
NVIDIA GeForce 405M
GeForce 405M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 33 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 15 votes

Rate GeForce 405M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.