Tesla V100 DGXS vs Quadro FX 1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1460not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.11no data
ArchitectureRankine (2003−2005)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameNV38GV100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date9 August 2004 (20 years ago)27 March 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data5120
Core clock speed350 MHz1297 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1530 MHz
Number of transistors135 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate2.800489.6
Floating-point processing powerno data15.67 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data640

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRHBM2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB32 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed275 MHz876 MHz
Memory bandwidth17.6 GB/s897.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0a12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 August 2004 27 March 2018
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 32 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 250 Watt

FX 1300 has 354.5% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 DGXS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 13 years, a 25500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 1300 and Tesla V100 DGXS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 1300
Quadro FX 1300
NVIDIA Tesla V100 DGXS
Tesla V100 DGXS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX 1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 13 votes

Rate Tesla V100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.