Radeon RX 7600M XT vs Quadro CX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro CX Quadro FX 3800 Quadro FX 4800 Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition Quadro FX 5800 Quadro Plex 2200 D2 Quadro Plex 2200 S4 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla M1060 Tesla S1070 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
Radeon RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600S Radeon RX 7700S Radeon RX 7800M Radeon RX 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro CX with Radeon RX 7600M XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro CX
2008
1536 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.25

RX 7600M XT outperforms CX by a whopping 1299% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro CX Quadro CX
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking857165
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency1.1219.50
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2025)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date11 November 2008 (16 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed602 MHz1280 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2469 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate38.53316.0
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS20.23 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs64128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.3-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro CX 2.25
RX 7600M XT 31.48
+1299%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro CX 947
RX 7600M XT 13265
+1301%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD8−9
−1388%
119
+1388%
1440p4−5
−1400%
60
+1400%
4K2−3
−1550%
33
+1550%

Cost per frame, $

1080p249.88no data
1440p499.75no data
4K999.50no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 331
+0%
331
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 116
+0%
116
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 146
+0%
146
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 317
+0%
317
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 96
+0%
96
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 245
+0%
245
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 192
+0%
192
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 111
+0%
111
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 81
+0%
81
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 127
+0%
127
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 237
+0%
237
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 179
+0%
179
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 133
+0%
133
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 85
+0%
85
+0%
Metro Exodus 98
+0%
98
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 186
+0%
186
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 74
+0%
74
+0%
Dota 2 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Far Cry 5 120
+0%
120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 180
+0%
180
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 65
+0%
65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 105
+0%
105
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 84
+0%
84
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70
+0%
70
+0%
Metro Exodus 58
+0%
58
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Far Cry 5 102
+0%
102
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 142
+0%
142
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 43
+0%
43
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21
+0%
21
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 74
+0%
74
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+0%
53
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 22
+0%
22
+0%
Dota 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 51
+0%
51
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90
+0%
90
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how Quadro CX and RX 7600M XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M XT is 1388% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M XT is 1400% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7600M XT is 1550% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 66 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.25 31.48
Recency 11 November 2008 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 120 Watt

RX 7600M XT has a 1299.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 816.7% more advanced lithography process, and 25% lower power consumption.

The Radeon RX 7600M XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro CX in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro CX is a workstation card while Radeon RX 7600M XT is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro CX
Quadro CX
AMD Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro CX Quadro CX
vs
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT
vs
RTX 2070 Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile
Quadro CX Quadro CX
vs
Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
FX 3800 FX 3800
vs
UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs
FX 3800 FX 3800
vs
RX 6850M XT RX 6850M XT
Quadro CX CX
vs
GT 730 GT 730
Quadro CX CX
vs
i740 i740
Quadro CX CX
vs
RTX A6000 RTX A6000
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
HD 7770M HD 7770M
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
GT 635M GT 635M
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
Tesla P4 Tesla P4
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
FX 5950 Ultra FX 5950 Ultra
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
ATI Rage 128 GL Rage 128 GL

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Quadro CX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 76 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro CX or Radeon RX 7600M XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.