Radeon RX 5700 vs Quadro CX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
CX FX 3800 FX 4800 FX 4800 Mac Edition FX 5800 Plex 2200 D2 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla M1060 Tesla S1070 Tesla S1075 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Next RX 5600 OEM RX 5600 XT RX 5700 RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary RX 5770

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro CX with Radeon RX 5700, including specs and performance data.

Quadro CX
2008, $1,999
1536 MB GDDR3, 150 Watt
2.26

RX 5700 outperforms CX by a whopping 1413% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro CX Quadro CX
RX 5700 RX 5700

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking901166
Place by popularitynot in top-10068
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0234.29
Power efficiency1.1614.59
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGT200BNavi 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (17 years ago)7 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999 $349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RX 5700 has 171350% better value for money than Quadro CX.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922304
Core clock speed602 MHz1465 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate38.53248.4
Floating-point processing power0.4623 TFLOPS7.949 TFLOPS
ROPs2464
TMUs64144
L2 Cache192 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm268 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1536 MB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth76.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.3-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro CX 2.26
RX 5700 34.19
+1413%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro CX 947
Samples: 3
RX 5700 14300
+1410%
Samples: 2995

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD7−8
−1529%
114
+1529%
1440p4−5
−1625%
69
+1625%
4K2−3
−2050%
43
+2050%

Cost per frame, $

1080p285.57
−9228%
3.06
+9228%
1440p499.75
−9780%
5.06
+9780%
4K999.50
−12215%
8.12
+12215%
  • RX 5700 has 9228% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • RX 5700 has 9780% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • RX 5700 has 12215% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 344
+0%
344
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 84
+0%
84
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 115
+0%
115
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 115
+0%
115
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 307
+0%
307
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+0%
75
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 156
+0%
156
+0%
Fortnite 166
+0%
166
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 132
+0%
132
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 86
+0%
86
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 151
+0%
151
+0%
Valorant 294
+0%
294
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 154
+0%
154
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+0%
67
+0%
Dota 2 156
+0%
156
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 144
+0%
144
+0%
Fortnite 140
+0%
140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130
+0%
130
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 137
+0%
137
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 68
+0%
68
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 144
+0%
144
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147
+0%
147
+0%
Valorant 291
+0%
291
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 135
+0%
135
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+0%
118
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139
+0%
139
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 91
+0%
91
+0%
Valorant 160
+0%
160
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 118
+0%
118
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 87
+0%
87
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Metro Exodus 51
+0%
51
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 277
+0%
277
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 81
+0%
81
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 36
+0%
36
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 103
+0%
103
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 38
+0%
38
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 77
+0%
77
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 25
+0%
25
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 72
+0%
72
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Metro Exodus 31
+0%
31
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 48
+0%
48
+0%
Valorant 231
+0%
231
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 54
+0%
54
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+0%
15
+0%
Dota 2 100
+0%
100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 47
+0%
47
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70
+0%
70
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 21
+0%
21
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 59
+0%
59
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 39
+0%
39
+0%

This is how Quadro CX and RX 5700 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 is 1529% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 is 1625% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 is 2050% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 69 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 2.26 34.19
Recency 11 November 2008 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 1536 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 180 Watt

Quadro CX has 20% lower power consumption.

RX 5700, on the other hand, has a 1412.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro CX in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro CX is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro CX
Quadro CX
AMD Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro CX Quadro CX
vs
FirePro W2100 FirePro W2100
RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700
vs
RTX 2060 GeForce RTX 2060
Quadro CX Quadro CX
vs
FX 4800 Quadro FX 4800
FX 3800 FX 3800
vs
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
NVS 440 NVS 440
vs
HD 7950 Mac Edition HD 7950 Mac Edition
Quadro CX CX
vs
GRID K100 GRID K100
Quadro CX CX
vs
FX 5200 FX 5200
Quadro CX CX
vs
RX 5770 RX 5770
Quadro CX CX
vs
RTX 3060 Mobile RTX 3060 Mobile
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
K2000D K2000D
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
NVS 510 NVS 510
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
Quadro 410 410
FX 4800 FX 4800
vs
ATI HD 2600 PRO HD 2600 PRO

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

5 1 vote

Rate Quadro CX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2280 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro CX or Radeon RX 5700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.