FirePro V5900 vs Quadro 6000

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Quadro 6000
2010
6 GB GDDR5
6.99
+114%

Quadro 6000 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 114% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking520702
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation0.301.15
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 3 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameGF100Cayman
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date10 December 2010 (13 years ago)24 May 2011 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,399 no data
Current price$1730 (0.4x MSRP)$89

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro V5900 has 283% better value for money than Quadro 6000.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores448512
Core clock speed574 MHz600 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million2,640 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)204 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate32.1419.20
Floating-point performance1,027.7 gflops614.4 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length248 mm230 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinNone

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed2988 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth143.4 GB/s64 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x DVI

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.0no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 6000 6.99
+114%
FirePro V5900 3.26

Quadro 6000 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 114% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 6000 2706
+114%
FirePro V5900 1263

Quadro 6000 outperforms FirePro V5900 by 114% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 6.99 3.26
Recency 10 December 2010 24 May 2011
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 204 Watt 75 Watt

The Quadro 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V5900 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Quadro 6000
AMD FirePro V5900
FirePro V5900

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 40 votes

Rate Quadro 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 47 votes

Rate FirePro V5900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.