ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs Quadro 600

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
600 2000 2000D 4000 5000 6000 Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 600 with Mobility Radeon HD 5650, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 600
2010, $179
1 GB DDR3, 40 Watt
1.24
ATI Mobility HD 5650
2010
1 GB GDDR3, 15 Watt
1.26
+1.6%

Mobility HD 5650 outperforms 600 by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility HD 5650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking10851079
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.06no data
Power efficiency2.396.47
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGF108Madison
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date13 December 2010 (15 years ago)7 January 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$179 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores96400
Core clock speed640 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors585 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate10.249.000
Floating-point processing power0.2458 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1620
L1 Cache128 KB40 KB
L2 Cache256 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length168 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount1 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA2.1-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p14−16
−7.1%
15
+7.1%
Full HD14−16
−14.3%
16
+14.3%

Cost per frame, $

1080p12.79no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 0−1 0−1

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Quadro 600 and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 7% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 14% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 43 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.24 1.26
Recency 13 December 2010 7 January 2010
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro 600 has an age advantage of 11 months.

ATI Mobility HD 5650, on the other hand, has a 2% higher aggregate performance score, and 167% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro 600 and Mobility Radeon HD 5650.

Be aware that Quadro 600 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
R7 M260 Radeon R7 M260
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
FirePro V3900 FirePro V3900
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
GRID K100 K100
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
RTX 5000 5000
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
RX 7900 XTX 7900 XTX
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 3050 Max-Q Refresh
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000
vs
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB A1000 Mobile 6 GB
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
GeForce 310M 310M
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
ATI Mobility HD 3400 3400
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
E6760 MXM E6760 MXM
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RX 5700 5700
Quadro 600 Quadro 600
vs
RTX 2060 Super 2060 Super

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 478 votes

Rate Quadro 600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 286 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 600 or Mobility Radeon HD 5650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.