FirePro M4150 vs Quadro 500M

Place in performance ranking	937	798
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.06	0.31
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code name	GF108	Opal
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	22 February 2011 (13 years ago)	16 October 2013 (10 years ago)
Current price	$58	$170

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

FirePro M4150 has 417% better value for money than Quadro 500M.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	96	384
Core clock speed	700 MHz	715 MHz
Number of transistors	585 million	950 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	no data
Texture fill rate	11.20	17.16
Floating-point performance	268.8 gflops	549.1 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro 500M and FirePro M4150 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Interface

MXM-A (3.0)

PCIe 3.0 x8

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	4000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	64 GB/s

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	2.1	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 500M 1.47

FirePro M4150 2.44
+66%

FirePro M4150 outperforms Quadro 500M by 66% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 500M 570

FirePro M4150 945
+65.8%

FirePro M4150 outperforms Quadro 500M by 66% in Passmark.