Radeon RX 5700 XT vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 2000 Quadro 2000D Quadro 4000 Quadro 4100 Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000 SDI Quadro 6000 Quadro 7000
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Radeon RX 5500 Radeon RX 5500 XT Radeon RX 5600 OEM Radeon RX 5600 XT Radeon RX 5700 Radeon RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5800 Radeon RX 5800 XT Radeon RX 5900 XT Radeon RX 7800 XT Radeon RX 7900 XTX

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000 with Radeon RX 5700 XT, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000
2011
2.5 GB GDDR5, 152 Watt
5.01

RX 5700 XT outperforms 5000 by a whopping 757% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
RX 5700 XT RX 5700 XT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking62686
Place by popularitynot in top-10072
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.1347.59
Power efficiency2.2813.19
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameGF100Navi 10
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date23 February 2011 (13 years ago)7 July 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5700 XT has 36508% better value for money than Quadro 5000.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3522560
Core clock speed513 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate22.57304.8
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs4064
TMUs44160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length248 mm272 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB8 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A+
CUDA2.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000 5.01
RX 5700 XT 42.93
+757%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 5000 1933
RX 5700 XT 16563
+757%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD14−16
−800%
126
+800%
1440p8−9
−825%
74
+825%
4K5−6
−820%
46
+820%

Cost per frame, $

1080p178.503.17
1440p312.385.39
4K499.808.67

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 76
+0%
76
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 110
+0%
110
+0%
Battlefield 5 199
+0%
199
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 118
+0%
118
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Far Cry 5 125
+0%
125
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 298
+0%
298
+0%
Hitman 3 84
+0%
84
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 313
+0%
313
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 259
+0%
259
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 154
+0%
154
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91
+0%
91
+0%
Battlefield 5 165
+0%
165
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 107
+0%
107
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75
+0%
75
+0%
Far Cry 5 101
+0%
101
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 108
+0%
108
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 283
+0%
283
+0%
Hitman 3 86
+0%
86
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 294
+0%
294
+0%
Metro Exodus 144
+0%
144
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 97
+0%
97
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 193
+0%
193
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 248
+0%
248
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 62
+0%
62
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 78
+0%
78
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80
+0%
80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 67
+0%
67
+0%
Far Cry 5 73
+0%
73
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 148
+0%
148
+0%
Hitman 3 83
+0%
83
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 135
+0%
135
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 171
+0%
171
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93
+0%
93
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 67
+0%
67
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+0%
108
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 126
+0%
126
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 84
+0%
84
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 53
+0%
53
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 59
+0%
59
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 58
+0%
58
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+0%
40
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 273
+0%
273
+0%
Hitman 3 59
+0%
59
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 104
+0%
104
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 119
+0%
119
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 241
+0%
241
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 79
+0%
79
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 44
+0%
44
+0%
Hitman 3 45
+0%
45
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 121
+0%
121
+0%
Metro Exodus 65
+0%
65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+0%
54
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35
+0%
35
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 33
+0%
33
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 33
+0%
33
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 17
+0%
17
+0%
Far Cry 5 30
+0%
30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+0%
79
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 71
+0%
71
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 13
+0%
13
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 40
+0%
40
+0%

This is how Quadro 5000 and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 800% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5700 XT is 825% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5700 XT is 820% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 72 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 5.01 42.93
Recency 23 February 2011 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 225 Watt

Quadro 5000 has 48% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 756.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 220% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 5000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 5700 XT is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Like
Like

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
RX 5700 XT Radeon RX 5700 XT
vs
RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary Radeon RX 5700 XT 50th Anniversary
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Pineview Pineview
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Cloverview Cloverview
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Exo Exo
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB GDDR5X
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
ATI VGA Wonder VGA Wonder
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X GeForce GTX 1060 8 GB GDDR5X
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Instinct MI100 Radeon Instinct MI100
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G4 Iris Xe Graphics G4
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
RTX 3060 Mobile GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
T1000 8 GB T1000 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 32 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 7686 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.