GeForce 9800M GTX SLI vs Quadro 5000

#ad 
Buy
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000 Mac Edition Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000 SDI Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000 SDI Tesla C2050 Tesla C2070 Tesla M2050 Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070-Q Tesla S2050
VS
#ad 
Buy
9800M GT 9800M GTS 9800M GT SLI 9800M GTS SLI 9800M GTX 9800M GTX SLI

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 5000 with GeForce 9800M GTX SLI, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 5000
2011
2.5 GB GDDR5, 152 Watt
4.36
+63.9%

5000 outperforms 9800M GTX SLI by an impressive 64% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
9800M GTX SLI 9800M GTX SLI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking648784
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.15no data
Power efficiency2.271.40
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)G9x (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGF100NB9E-GTX
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 February 2011 (14 years ago)15 July 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores352224
Core clock speed513 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 million3016 Million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)152 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate22.57no data
Floating-point processing power0.7223 TFLOPSno data
ROPs40no data
TMUs44no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length248 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data
SLI options-+

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2.5 GB1 GB
Memory bus width320 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth120.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.0+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Valorant 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Metro Exodus 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hogwarts Legacy 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Valorant 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Dota 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Far Cry 5 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 4.36 2.66
Recency 23 February 2011 15 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 2.5 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 152 Watt 150 Watt

Quadro 5000 has a 63.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 150% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 62.5% more advanced lithography process.

9800M GTX SLI, on the other hand, has 1.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro 5000 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9800M GTX SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 5000 is a workstation card while GeForce 9800M GTX SLI is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 5000
Quadro 5000
NVIDIA GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
9800M GTX SLI GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
vs
HD 7750M Radeon HD 7750M
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
PRO WX 2100 Radeon PRO WX 2100
Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
vs
Quadro CX Quadro CX
Quadro 2000D Quadro 2000D
vs
RTX 2060 Super GeForce RTX 2060 Super
Tesla S2050 Tesla S2050
vs
Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB Tesla V100 PCIe 32 GB
Quadro 400 Quadro 400
vs
Arc A750 Arc A750
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
GTX 550 Ti GeForce GTX 550 Ti
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
GT 330 OEM GeForce GT 330 OEM
R2 Graphics Radeon R2 Graphics
vs
RX Vega 9 Radeon RX Vega 9
R5 Graphics Radeon R5 Graphics
vs
ATI HD 3200 Radeon HD 3200
R5 Graphics Radeon R5 Graphics
vs
RTX 3050 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q
R5 Graphics Radeon R5 Graphics
vs
GTX 1630 GeForce GTX 1630

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.5 33 votes

Rate Quadro 5000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 13 votes

Rate GeForce 9800M GTX SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 5000 or GeForce 9800M GTX SLI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.