Radeon RX 7600M vs Quadro 410

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
K1 K100 K120Q K140Q K160Q K340 NVS 510 Quadro 410 Quadro K420 Quadro K600 Quadro K2000 Quadro K2000D
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
7600M 7600M XT 7600S 7700S 7800M 7900M

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 410 with Radeon RX 7600M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 410
2012, $149
512 MB DDR3, 38 Watt
1.01

7600M outperforms 410 by a whopping 2470% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
RX 7600M RX 7600M

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1146248
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.05no data
Power efficiency2.0722.45
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameGK107Navi 33
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date7 August 2012 (13 years ago)4 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1921792
Core clock speed706 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2410 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million13,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt90 Watt
Texture fill rate11.30269.9
Floating-point processing power0.2711 TFLOPS17.27 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28
L0 Cacheno data448 KB
L1 Cache16 KB512 KB
L2 Cache128 KB2 MB
L3 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length176 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed891 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.26 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.0-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro 410 1.01
RX 7600M 25.96
+2470%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 410 426
Samples: 120
RX 7600M 10999
+2482%
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD3−4
−2700%
84
+2700%
1440p1−2
−4200%
43
+4200%
4K0−123

Cost per frame, $

1080p49.67no data
1440p149.00no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 164
+0%
164
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 112
+0%
112
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 113
+0%
113
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 111
+0%
111
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 138
+0%
138
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Dota 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 94
+0%
94
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 62
+0%
62
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 15
+0%
15
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%

This is how Quadro 410 and RX 7600M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7600M is 2700% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7600M is 4200% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 64 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 1.01 25.96
Recency 7 August 2012 4 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 90 Watt

Quadro 410 has 136.8% lower power consumption.

RX 7600M, on the other hand, has a 2470.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7600M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 410 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 410 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7600M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 410
Quadro 410
AMD Radeon RX 7600M
Radeon RX 7600M
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
FX 4600 Quadro FX 4600
RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M
vs
GTX 1070 Mobile GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
FX 3700 Quadro FX 3700
Tesla K20c Tesla K20c
vs
T550 Mobile T550 Mobile
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
RX 570X RX 570X
NVS 510 NVS 510
vs
RX 7600 XT RX 7600 XT
Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000
vs
GT 705 OEM GT 705 OEM
Quadro 410 Quadro 410
vs
HD 8470D HD 8470D
K5000 Mac Edition Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
vs
Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EU Xe Graphics G7 96EU
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
ATI X1300 PRO Radeon X1300 PRO
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
GT 440 OEM GT 440 OEM
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
T2000 Mobile Quadro T2000 Mobile
NVS 310 NVS 310
vs
RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.6 14 votes

Rate Quadro 410 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 46 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7600M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 410 or Radeon RX 7600M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.