H3C XG310 vs Quadro 4000M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 736 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 0.33 | no data |
| Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | Generation 12.1 (2020−2021) |
| GPU code name | Fermi | DG1 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 22 February 2011 (13 years ago) | 11 November 2020 (3 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $449 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 336 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | 475 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1550 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 1,950 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 26.60 | 74.40 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.6384 gflops | 2.381 gflops |
| ROPs | 32 | 24 |
| TMUs | 56 | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | large | no data |
| Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Width | no data | 1-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 1x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz | 4.3 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | 68.26 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 3.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
| CUDA | 2.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 22 February 2011 | 11 November 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 8 GB |
| Chip lithography | 40 nm | 10 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 100 Watt | 300 Watt |
Quadro 4000M has 200% lower power consumption.
H3C XG310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro 4000M and H3C XG310. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro 4000M is a mobile workstation card while H3C XG310 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
