GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Quadro 4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro 4000 Quadro 5000 Quadro 6000 Tesla C2050
VS
RTX 4050 Max-Q RTX 4050 Mobile RTX 4060 Max-Q RTX 4060 Mobile RTX 4060 Ti Mobile RTX 4070 Max-Q RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4080 Max-Q RTX 4080 Mobile RTX 4080 Ti Max-Q RTX 4080 Ti Mobile RTX 4090 Max-Q RTX 4090 Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 4000 with GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 4000
2010
2 GB GDDR5, 142 Watt
3.84

RTX 4070 Mobile outperforms 4000 by a whopping 1227% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
RTX 4070 Mobile RTX 4070 Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking70956
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.19no data
Power efficiency1.8630.49
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF100AD106
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date2 November 2010 (14 years ago)3 January 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2564608
Core clock speed475 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors3,100 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)142 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate15.20244.1
Floating-point processing power0.4864 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs3248
TMUs32144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed702 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth89.86 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.08.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 4000 3.84
RTX 4070 Mobile 50.94
+1227%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro 4000 1476
RTX 4070 Mobile 19581
+1227%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD9−10
−1322%
128
+1322%
1440p5−6
−1380%
74
+1380%
4K3−4
−1467%
47
+1467%

Cost per frame, $

1080p133.22no data
1440p239.80no data
4K399.67no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 133
+0%
133
+0%
Elden Ring 147
+0%
147
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 111
+0%
111
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 285
+0%
285
+0%
Metro Exodus 140
+0%
140
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 94
+0%
94
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+0%
49
+0%
Dota 2 156
+0%
156
+0%
Elden Ring 227
+0%
227
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Fortnite 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 233
+0%
233
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 145
+0%
145
+0%
Metro Exodus 111
+0%
111
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
World of Tanks 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 83
+0%
83
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 44
+0%
44
+0%
Dota 2 167
+0%
167
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 203
+0%
203
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Elden Ring 125
+0%
125
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 89
+0%
89
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
World of Tanks 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 51
+0%
51
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 105
+0%
105
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 88
+0%
88
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30
+0%
30
+0%
Dota 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Elden Ring 64
+0%
64
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 89
+0%
89
+0%
Metro Exodus 44
+0%
44
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 89
+0%
89
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12
+0%
12
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

This is how Quadro 4000 and RTX 4070 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 1322% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 1380% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 Mobile is 1467% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 3.84 50.94
Recency 2 November 2010 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 142 Watt 115 Watt

RTX 4070 Mobile has a 1226.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 23.5% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 4000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 4000
Quadro 4000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
FirePro W4100 FirePro W4100
RTX 4070 Mobile GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
vs
RTX 3080 Ti Mobile GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile
Quadro 4000 Quadro 4000
vs
ATI V5800 FirePro V5800
ATI Mobility HD 4330 Mobility Radeon HD 4330
vs
Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics Graphics Media Accelerator (GMA) HD Graphics
HD Graphics 4600 HD Graphics 4600
vs
UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU) UHD Graphics (Jasper Lake 24 EU)
8400 GS GeForce 8400 GS
vs
RTX 4070 Ti GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Vega 8 Embedded Radeon Vega 8 Embedded
vs
T1200 Mobile Quadro T1200 Mobile
Apple M1 8-Core GPU M1 8 Core GPU
vs
RX Vega M GL / 870 Radeon RX Vega M GL / 870
HD 6990M Crossfire Radeon HD 6990M Crossfire
vs
GTX 1050 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q
7600 GT Mac Edition GeForce 7600 GT Mac Edition
vs
Apple M1 7-Core GPU M1 7 Core GPU
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
vs
Apple M1 Pro 14-Core GPU M1 Pro 14-Core GPU
GTX 275 GeForce GTX 275
vs
R5 M330 Radeon R5 M330
Arc A750 Arc A750
vs
RX 7600M XT Radeon RX 7600M XT

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.5 188 votes

Rate Quadro 4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 1865 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.