ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650 vs Quadro 400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
NVS 300 400 CX FX 3800 FX 4800 FX 4800 Mac Edition FX 5800 Tesla C1060 Tesla C1080 Tesla M1060 Tesla S1070 Tesla T10 Processor
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
5145 5165 5430 5450 5470 5570 5650 5670 Mac Edition 5730 5750 5770 5830 5850 5850 Mac Edition 5870 5870 Crossfire

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro 400 with Mobility Radeon HD 5650, including specs and performance data.

Quadro 400
2011, $169
512 MB DDR3, 32 Watt
0.35

Mobility HD 5650 outperforms 400 by a whopping 254% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro 400 Quadro 400
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility HD 5650

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13361072
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.856.43
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGT216Madison
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date5 April 2011 (14 years ago)7 January 2010 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores48400
Core clock speed450 MHz450 MHz
Boost clock speedno data650 MHz
Number of transistors486 million627 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)32 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate7.2009.000
Floating-point processing power0.108 TFLOPS0.36 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1620
L1 Cacheno data40 KB
L2 Cache32 KB256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount512 MB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed770 MHz800 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.32 GB/s25.6 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.15.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p4−5
−275%
15
+275%
Full HD4−5
−300%
16
+300%

Cost per frame, $

1080p42.25no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 39
+0%
39
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 0−1 0−1
Metro Exodus 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Dota 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%
Valorant 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Valorant 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Escape from Tarkov 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Valorant 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

4K
Ultra

Dota 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%

This is how Quadro 400 and ATI Mobility HD 5650 compete in popular games:

  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 275% faster in 900p
  • ATI Mobility HD 5650 is 300% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 47 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.35 1.24
Recency 5 April 2011 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 1 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 32 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro 400 has an age advantage of 1 year.

ATI Mobility HD 5650, on the other hand, has a 254.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 113.3% lower power consumption.

The Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro 400 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro 400 is a workstation graphics card while Mobility Radeon HD 5650 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro 400
Quadro 400
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Mobility Radeon HD 5650
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro 400 Quadro 400
vs
FX 380 LP Quadro FX 380 LP
ATI Mobility HD 5650 Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
HD 6550M Radeon HD 6550M
Quadro 400 Quadro 400
vs
FirePro 2270 FirePro 2270
Tesla S2050 Tesla S2050
vs
RTX 5090 D RTX 5090 D
Tesla X2090 Tesla X2090
vs
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile
4000 Mac Edition Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
vs
ATI HD 2600 XT Mac Edition HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
4000 Mac Edition Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
vs
UHD Graphics 610 Graphics 610
4000 Mac Edition Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
vs
MX450 25W GeForce MX450 25W
Quadro 400 Quadro 400
vs
Quadro P620 Quadro P620
Quadro 400 Quadro 400
vs
GeForce 6100 GeForce 6100
Quadro 400 Quadro 400
vs
GTX 1650 TU116 GTX 1650 TU116
Quadro 400 Quadro 400
vs
RTX 4070 Ti SUPER RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
Quadro 5000 Quadro 5000
vs
Quadro 5010M Quadro 5010M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.2 16 votes

Rate Quadro 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 282 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 5650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 400 or Mobility Radeon HD 5650, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.